The World Economic Forum is so green this year it could be mistaken for a naturalists' convention.
Beneath the Magic Mountain of Davos, the main floor of its sweeping Congress Centre features a tented sculpture made of seaweed, to showcase natural materials; a large apple tree grafted from 40 different species; and display tables of artisanal work that used to be consigned to museums by Davos-style globalization. The marquee speaking slots once reserved for Sheryl Sandberg and Eric Schmidt are now the property of Greta Thunberg and Jane Goodall. And the small backpacks given to delegates are made of recycled cloth. Even the caterers are encouraged to serve local foods and wines, and adhere to a full day of vegetarian menus this week.
Don’t worry, the WEF hasn’t gone all hippie. It’s just trying to address the biggest risks in business, which are pretty much all related to climate change and the environment. For the first time, the Forum’s Global Risks Report is dominated by them, with the top five spots of likely risks going to environmental issues (extreme weather, climate action failure, natural disaster, biodiversity loss and human-made environmental disasters) – and topping the list for impact, ahead of nuclear war.
Beyond displays of seaweed, the Forum is pushing the world’s top corporations and governments here to pursue a Net Zero strategy, meaning they’d pull as much carbon out of the atmosphere as they put into it. Its new paper, “The Net Zero Challenge: Fast Forward to Decisive Climate Action,” makes the case for unilateral action for countries and companies because the chances of a global or even multilateral solution are dimming by the year.
Some key points:
- Few countries are on course to meet their Paris targets
- Few countries have a credible plan to get to Net Zero emissions
- Companies and sectors need to chart their own course to Net Zero, and should do so for self-serving reasons: to drive efficiencies, force innovation, earn the social license to operate in communities concerned about climate change, and stay ahead of the demands of regulators and investors
There are plenty of companies at Davos that argue they’re ahead of governments on climate action. Microsoft last week declared it will be carbon negative by 2030. Unilever, Levi’s and IKEA are among those with ambitious plans that aren’t relying on government action, as are major Canadian energy producers Suncor, Cenovus and Canadian Natural Resources, which have each stated a Net Zero goal or released significant emission reduction plans. “While no single actor can halt global warming alone, efforts by leading industrial nations or large corporations can have a multiplier effect,” the WEF report notes.
As Senior Vice-President, Office of the CEO, John advises the executive leadership on emerging trends in Canada’s economy, providing insights grounded in his travels across the country and around the world. His work focuses on technological change and innovation, examining how to successfully navigate the new economy so more people can thrive in the age of disruption. Prior to joining RBC, John spent nearly 25 years at the Globe and Mail, where he served as editor-in-chief, editor of Report on Business, and a foreign correspondent in New Delhi, India. He is the author of three books and has a fourth underway.
This article is intended as general information only and is not to be relied upon as constituting legal, financial or other professional advice. A professional advisor should be consulted regarding your specific situation. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by Royal Bank of Canada or any of its affiliates.