- Sustainable finance is top of mind in Glasgow, with major financial institutions committing to financing the global energy transition.
- Sustainable finance has grown rapidly to nearly $450 billion annually, but by some estimates is only one eighth of what’s needed.
- Carbon pricing policies in advanced economies and international standards on offsetting can both increase green finance flows and shift where they are heading.
We must urgently increase spending on emissions cuts if we’re to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The cost of failure is high: the planet has warmed some 1.1°C since the mid-1800s—and investing enough in abatement and adaptation is critical to combatting the existential threat of further increases. Doing too little, or acting too late, could set off climate tipping points that balloon the costs associated with climate change, from heat waves and storms to mass migration and biodiversity loss.
Global green and sustainable finance has grown rapidly in recent years, nearly doubling since 2018. But it remains far from the estimated US$4 trillion the International Energy Agency expects we need to invest annually by 2030 to meet our climate targets. As we highlighted in our recent report, much of the investment so far has been aimed at electricity generation. Increasing sustainable finance flows, and broadening which countries and sectors can access private sustainable finance, remains the challenge.
Governments and businesses in advanced economies make up 30% of emissions and have issued 80% of sustainable finance.
Europe stands out in this group, issuing more than half of annual green finance. European investment is roughly at the scale needed for transition, relative to their share of emissions. But maintaining the current pace while also investing in harder-to-abate sectors may yet prove challenging. Other advanced economies have devoted larger shares of green financing to retrofitting buildings—a key effort all economies must accelerate. Outside Europe, though, green financing needs to increase.
A bigger shortfall in green financing exists in emerging markets. In all, investors may need to funnel over US$2 trillion annually into emerging market decarbonization by 2030, relative to just US$70 billion today. In Glasgow, advanced economies strengthened efforts to fulfill their US$100 billion annual commitment to fund emerging market transition—but the real challenge is of a much gre.ater magnitude
The Road Ahead
In advanced economies, the task is to maintain current growth in sustainable finance, and ensure all sectors of the economy are funded. Industry sees little finance for instance, despite being responsible for many emissions. As we noted in our prior report, that’s not due to a lack of money. Advanced economies must work together to establish guidelines for sustainable projects that reflect differing economic realities, expanding on the foundational work of the EU in writing green taxonomies. This, coupled with efforts to boost the profitability of green industrial projects, will get more projects done and bring long-term investors to the table.
Boosting climate finance to emerging markets will be more challenging, but no less important. For now, advanced economies can de-risk projects with “blended” finance: providing guarantees and taking first loss positions that help crowd in private sector investment. Using some of the US$100 billion already committed to do this could begin to move the needle towards the US$2 trillion annual goal. But over the long term, strategies that encourage large emitters to invest in cuts across their global operations could be more fruitful. International standards that allow investments in foreign operations to count against domestic carbon taxes in major pricing systems, and against national goals via Article 6 of the Paris Agreement could move us one step closer to an integrated global carbon market. That would achieve more emissions reductions sooner and more cost-efficiently, including by accelerating climate-related financial flows from advanced economies to emerging markets, where they would have great impact.
Colin Guldimann is an economist at RBC. He works primarily on issues related to the public sector, energy, and climate change. Prior to joining RBC, Colin worked on housing policy and macroeconomic research at the Department of Finance in Ottawa.
This article is intended as general information only and is not to be relied upon as constituting legal, financial or other professional advice. A professional advisor should be consulted regarding your specific situation. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by Royal Bank of Canada or any of its affiliates.